<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private VLANs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ccietalk.com/2008/06/05/private-vlans/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ccietalk.com/2008/06/05/private-vlans</link>
	<description>Technology Blog For Network Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CCIETalk</title>
		<link>http://www.ccietalk.com/2008/06/05/private-vlans/comment-page-1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>CCIETalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccietalk.com/?p=57#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Just read the documentation and this is what I found &quot;Though visible in the command-line interface, the private-vlan command is not supported&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the documentation and this is what I found &#8220;Though visible in the command-line interface, the private-vlan command is not supported&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCIETalk</title>
		<link>http://www.ccietalk.com/2008/06/05/private-vlans/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>CCIETalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccietalk.com/?p=57#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I hope that also supports IPv6. I am working on QoS right now but I would be really interested to find out. Please keep us posted,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I hope that also supports IPv6. I am working on QoS right now but I would be really interested to find out. Please keep us posted,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Willson</title>
		<link>http://www.ccietalk.com/2008/06/05/private-vlans/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccietalk.com/?p=57#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Actually I was going to test if the 12.2(44)SE2 release for the 3550 (EMI) *does* support PVLANs. According to the release notes it does. To quote the software advisor:

Feature Descriptions
	
Private VLANs 	Allows multiple VLANs with layer-2 isolation to exist within a single subnet. Provides security by preventing access to an entire network through a single server; also can save address space. Restrictions include that VTP mode must be set to transparent.

We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I was going to test if the 12.2(44)SE2 release for the 3550 (EMI) *does* support PVLANs. According to the release notes it does. To quote the software advisor:</p>
<p>Feature Descriptions</p>
<p>Private VLANs 	Allows multiple VLANs with layer-2 isolation to exist within a single subnet. Provides security by preventing access to an entire network through a single server; also can save address space. Restrictions include that VTP mode must be set to transparent.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
